张 良 平 . 跳跃远度项目起跳技术生物力学特征对比分析[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2013, (12): 98-100.
    引用本文: 张 良 平 . 跳跃远度项目起跳技术生物力学特征对比分析[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2013, (12): 98-100.
    ZHANG Liang-ping. Comparative Analysis of Biomechanical Characteristicsin the Take-off Skills of Male Athletes' Long Jump Sports Items[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2013, (12): 98-100.
    Citation: ZHANG Liang-ping. Comparative Analysis of Biomechanical Characteristicsin the Take-off Skills of Male Athletes' Long Jump Sports Items[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2013, (12): 98-100.

    跳跃远度项目起跳技术生物力学特征对比分析

    Comparative Analysis of Biomechanical Characteristicsin the Take-off Skills of Male Athletes' Long Jump Sports Items

    • 摘要: 采用文献资料法、专家访谈法、实验法和统计法,对同一级别男子三级跳远起跳(第一跳)和跳远起跳技术的力学特征进行对比分析.两者生物力学特征的差异主要表现为:冲击阶段,跳远运动员起跳着板瞬间至进入屈膝缓冲瞬间,跳远受到的冲击力较大,且呈现出较大差异; 反射蹬伸阶段,跳远的反射蹬伸峰值较大,因此跳远的腾起角较大.从动力学参数来看,跳远起跳更侧重于“用力跳”,三级跳远第一跳则更侧重于“快速起”

       

      Abstract: By means of mathematical statistics, literature reviews, experiments and statistical analysis, the mechanical characteristics in the take-off technology of both men's triple jump and long jump were subjected to a contrastive analysis. The biomechanical characteristics of the two differ chiefly: in the sprint stage, a long jump athlete receives a stronger impact than a triple jumper in the period through the board-landing instant to the dipping instant of knees; in the reflective stretching stage, the peak value of long jumper's reflective stretching force is bigger, so the long jumper's take-off angle is bigger. In terms of kinetic parameters, all a best long jumper does is to give an all-out “jump” while the best triple jumper focuses most on a rapid take-off

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回