王子丽, 吴赋光. 毛泽东“反特权阶层”思想与奥尔森破“分利联盟”理论的借鉴价值[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2013, (1): 40-44.
    引用本文: 王子丽, 吴赋光. 毛泽东“反特权阶层”思想与奥尔森破“分利联盟”理论的借鉴价值[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2013, (1): 40-44.
    WANG Li, WU Fuguang. On Reference Value of MAO Zedong’s Thoughts against Privileged Class and Olson’s Theory of Distributional Coalitions[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2013, (1): 40-44.
    Citation: WANG Li, WU Fuguang. On Reference Value of MAO Zedong’s Thoughts against Privileged Class and Olson’s Theory of Distributional Coalitions[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2013, (1): 40-44.

    毛泽东“反特权阶层”思想与奥尔森破“分利联盟”理论的借鉴价值

    On Reference Value of MAO Zedong’s Thoughts against Privileged Class and Olson’s Theory of Distributional Coalitions

    • 摘要: 一个社会失去了以群众利益为最高利益的价值观和不能为人民群众提供政治参与的渠道,在政治秩序超稳运行的条件下必定会形成由少数人共谋形成的垄断社会资源的既得利益集团,毛泽东称之为“特权阶层”,奥尔森称之为“分利联盟”。这种既得利益集团只关心如何在社会总财富中瓜分更大的份额,而不再关心如何创造更多的社会财富,其危害性一是使市场经济秩序不能扩展到全社会,阻碍市场经济的健康发展;二是造成政令不畅,政治体制出现肥大症和僵化症,最终危及政权存亡。只有批判继承毛泽东的群众思想和奥尔森的“司法一体化”原则去打破这些既得利益集团,才能有助于社会秩序的长治久安。

       

      Abstract: A Society which has lost the values with mass’ interest as the highest one and fails to provide channels for people to participate in politics will tend to be a group of minority which monopolize the social resources under the over-stable political order. Such society was called privileged class by MAO Ze-dong and distributional coalition by Olson. Such group only care how to get more social wealth instead of how to create more. Their harm lies in that the market economic order cannot be expanded to the whole society and even hinders it from healthy development, and political orders cannot be implemented and the political system tends to be oversized and eventually the political power will be endangered. Only when we inherit critically MAO Ze-dong’s thought concerning mass and Olson’s judicial integrity principle to destroy such groups can we keep our society stable.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回