高级搜索
    周钧韬. 重论《金瓶梅》初刻本问世年代“万历末年说”[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2012, (1): 4-7.
    引用本文: 周钧韬. 重论《金瓶梅》初刻本问世年代“万历末年说”[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2012, (1): 4-7.
    shu
    ZHOU Juntao. A Re-probe into the View of the Late Years of Wanli Emperor as the First Publication Date of Chin Pingmei[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2012, (1): 4-7.
    Citation: ZHOU Juntao. A Re-probe into the View of the Late Years of Wanli Emperor as the First Publication Date of Chin Pingmei[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2012, (1): 4-7.
    shu

    重论《金瓶梅》初刻本问世年代“万历末年说”

    A Re-probe into the View of the Late Years of Wanli Emperor as the First Publication Date of Chin Pingmei

      摘要
    • 摘要: 台湾学者魏子云通过民国《吴县志》考证，否定鲁迅的《金瓶梅》初刻本问世于明代万历庚戌（三十八年）的权威论点。但魏的考证中存在三个问题。通过对清康熙《浒墅关志》考证，解决了魏的考证中存在的三个问题，从而彻底否定了鲁迅的权威论点。又通过多个考证，认定《金瓶梅》初刻本问世在万历四十五年冬到万历四十七年之间，从而提出了《金瓶梅》初刻本问世年代“万历末年说”。

       

      Abstract: Through the study of Chronicles of County Wu published in the period of Republic of China, the Taiwan scholar, WEI Zi-yun challenged the authoritative view by LU Xun that the first publication of Chin Pingmei appeared in Gengshu period (the 38th year of Wanli Emperor). However, there exist three problems. This paper, through the study of Chronicles of Hushuguan, has solved those three problems and hence completely overthrown the authoritative LU Xun’s view. Further, it has inferred from the other studies that the first edition of the novel appeared during the period from 45th to 47th year of Wanli Emperor. And accordingly, it has drawn the conclusion that the novel first appeared in the late years of the emperor.

       

      • HTML全文
      • 参考文献(11)
      • 相关文章
      • 施引文献
    • 资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回