黄雪. 协商性刑事司法中的契约真实——兼论我国刑事诉讼真实观J. 内江师范学院学报, 2026, 41(9): 83-89. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.09.013
    引用本文: 黄雪. 协商性刑事司法中的契约真实——兼论我国刑事诉讼真实观J. 内江师范学院学报, 2026, 41(9): 83-89. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.09.013
    Huang Xue. The Contractual Truth in Negotiable Criminal Justice: On the View of Criminal Litigation Truth in ChinaJ. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2026, 41(9): 83-89. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.09.013
    Citation: Huang Xue. The Contractual Truth in Negotiable Criminal Justice: On the View of Criminal Litigation Truth in ChinaJ. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2026, 41(9): 83-89. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.09.013

    协商性刑事司法中的契约真实——兼论我国刑事诉讼真实观

    The Contractual Truth in Negotiable Criminal Justice: On the View of Criminal Litigation Truth in China

    • 摘要: 秉持何种诉讼真实观,关乎事实认定的基本准线。对抗性刑事司法中的客观真实观和法律真实观是诉讼真实观演变历程中的典型学说。基于协商性刑事司法在我国的兴起,诉讼真实观同样需要作出相应转变,才能使得程序运行更为自洽。契约真实是一种程序机能主义真实,通过控辩双方达成的契约来形成诉讼真实。它强调程序参与人的主体性,符合协商性司法以平和、协商的方式化解矛盾的价值追求。契约真实的立体化实现路径为:审前阶段通过细化具结书的契约内容和确认值班律师的辩护人地位,从而保证契约的明确与有效;审判阶段通过审查事实基础、自愿意志、正当程序,从而保证契约的真实且合法。

       

      Abstract: The truth conception one holds is crucial to the basic standard for finding out fact. In adversarial criminal justice, the objective truth and the legal truth are representative doctrines in the historical evolution of theories of evidentiary truth. Given the rise of negotiated criminal justice in China, the corresponding transformation of the truth conception is necessary to render the procedural operation more internally coherent. Contractual truth, as a procedurally functional truth conception, is constructed through agreements between the prosecution and the defense. It emphasizes the subjectivity of procedural participants, which aligns with the normative ideal of negotiated justice, namely, resolving conflicts through peaceful and consultative means. The three-dimensional path to contractual truth comprises pre-trial and trial-stage mechanisms. Firstly, pre-trial procedures ensure clarity and validity by specifying the contents of plea statements and recognizing the defense counsel status of duty lawyers. Secondly, trial proceedings safeguard truth and legality by verifying the factual basis, voluntary intent, and adherence to due process.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回