李娅菲, 孙振田. 《汉书·艺文志·诗赋略》序文释读的两个问题J. 内江师范学院学报, 2026, 41(7): 19-24. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.07.004
    引用本文: 李娅菲, 孙振田. 《汉书·艺文志·诗赋略》序文释读的两个问题J. 内江师范学院学报, 2026, 41(7): 19-24. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.07.004
    LI Yafei, SUN Zhentian. Two Issues in Interpretation of the Preface to Treatise on Poetry and Fu of Literature Record in Book of HanJ. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2026, 41(7): 19-24. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.07.004
    Citation: LI Yafei, SUN Zhentian. Two Issues in Interpretation of the Preface to Treatise on Poetry and Fu of Literature Record in Book of HanJ. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2026, 41(7): 19-24. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.07.004

    《汉书·艺文志·诗赋略》序文释读的两个问题

    Two Issues in Interpretation of the Preface to Treatise on Poetry and Fu of Literature Record in Book of Han

    • 摘要: 《诗赋略》序文中的“不歌而诵谓之赋”与“登高能赋”之“赋”,均指一种表达方式(诵);“赋”(诵)的内容取决于具体的场景与所要解决的问题,并不限于《诗》。作为作品或文体的“赋”不是由先王之“列大夫”之职守衍生而来,而是由诸侯之“卿大夫”之职守衍生而来。“咸有恻隐古诗之义”,指荀卿、屈原的赋作同情、怜悯古诗受到了冷落、古诗的风谕精神得不到继承与发扬,解读时需将其隐含之意还原并加以呈现。

       

      Abstract: In the preface to Treatise on Poetry and Fu of Literature Record in Book of Han, the term fu, rhyme-prose, refers to a mode of expression. The content of such recitation depends on the specific context and practical issues at hand. In other words, it is not confined to any single canonical text. Certainly, it is not confined to The Book of Songs. Furthermore, fu as a literary genre did not originate from the duties of the ancient kings’ senior officials. Instead, it stemmed from the high-ranking officials’ responsibilities of the feudal lords. The claim that their works capture the sentimental resonance of ancient poetry is highly revealing. In their fu, XUN Qing and QU Yuan lament ancient poetry fell into neglection. To interpret their ideas accurately, we need uncover and articulate these underlying connotations.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回