武晓静, 张晨欣. 创作观念的两面和实践经验的多义——李渔《闲情偶寄》的戏剧学新探J. 内江师范学院学报, 2026, 41(7): 13-18. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.07.003
    引用本文: 武晓静, 张晨欣. 创作观念的两面和实践经验的多义——李渔《闲情偶寄》的戏剧学新探J. 内江师范学院学报, 2026, 41(7): 13-18. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.07.003
    WU Xiaojing, ZHANG Chenxin. Conceptual Dualities and Practical Multiplicities: A New Dramaturgical Approach to LI Yu’s Occasional Notes with Leisure MotionsJ. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2026, 41(7): 13-18. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.07.003
    Citation: WU Xiaojing, ZHANG Chenxin. Conceptual Dualities and Practical Multiplicities: A New Dramaturgical Approach to LI Yu’s Occasional Notes with Leisure MotionsJ. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2026, 41(7): 13-18. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.07.003

    创作观念的两面和实践经验的多义——李渔《闲情偶寄》的戏剧学新探

    Conceptual Dualities and Practical Multiplicities: A New Dramaturgical Approach to LI Yu’s Occasional Notes with Leisure Motions

    • 摘要: 李渔的《闲情偶寄》呈现出显著的“两面性”:在创作观念上,他既力主“求新尚奇”以反拨时弊,又推崇元杂剧经典并恪守音律传统,形成了一种以复古为创新的辩证思路;在理论重心上,他虽论及脚色、念白等表演要素,但其根本立场仍是以文人编剧为本位,重文学性而轻表演性。这种看似矛盾的多义性,根植于李渔兼具教习、班主、编剧等多重身份及其复杂而丰富的戏曲实践。因此,当代研究不宜简单运用“导演学”等现代学科术语对其理论进行拔高或定位,而应回归历史语境,充分尊重其作为历史实践的完整性与复杂性。唯有如此,才能更准确地评估李渔在中国戏剧学史上的地位,同时为探讨如何运用现代学术术语呈现中国古代文论思想提供可资参考的案例。

       

      Abstract: LI Yu’s Occasional Notes with Leisure Motions has presented a striking duality. In terms of creative ideas, he advocated pursuing novelty and uniqueness to rectify prevalent malpractices in his time. Simultaneously, he held the classics of zaju of Yuan Dynasty in high regard and abode by traditional tonal and metrical rules. Together, these tendencies constitute a dialectical mindset in pursuit of innovation via revival. Regarding theoretical focus, he has touched upon performance elements like role types and spoken lines. However, his fundamental stance has kept rooted in the literati playwright’s perspective with an emphasis on literary quality over theatricality. This seemingly contradictory multiplicity is rooted in his diverse roles: educator, troupe manager and active playwright in the theatrical field. For this reason, contemporary scholarship should refrain from imposing modern frameworks like theatrical directing upon his ideas. Instead, researchers must interpret his thoughts against the historical backdrop of his time. Only by fully respecting the integrity and complexity of his historical practice can we accurately assess LI’s position in Chinese dramaturgy. Furthermore, this offers a valuable reference for articulating pre-modern theories via modern academic terminology.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回