闻雯, 王俊午, 许蓉, 王永. 大学生感知的父母教养方式、留守经历与亲子依恋:基于主客体互倚模型分析J. 内江师范学院学报, 2026, 41(6): 98-106. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.06.011
    引用本文: 闻雯, 王俊午, 许蓉, 王永. 大学生感知的父母教养方式、留守经历与亲子依恋:基于主客体互倚模型分析J. 内江师范学院学报, 2026, 41(6): 98-106. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.06.011
    WEN Wen, WANG Junwu, XU Rong, WANG Yong. College students’ perceptions of parenting style,left-behind experience and parent-child attachment:an analysis based on the actor-partner interdependence modelJ. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2026, 41(6): 98-106. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.06.011
    Citation: WEN Wen, WANG Junwu, XU Rong, WANG Yong. College students’ perceptions of parenting style,left-behind experience and parent-child attachment:an analysis based on the actor-partner interdependence modelJ. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2026, 41(6): 98-106. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.06.011

    大学生感知的父母教养方式、留守经历与亲子依恋:基于主客体互倚模型分析

    College students’ perceptions of parenting style,left-behind experience and parent-child attachment:an analysis based on the actor-partner interdependence model

    • 摘要: 为探讨大学生感知的父母教养方式与亲子依恋的关系以及留守经历在其中的作用,采用简式父母教养方式问卷中文版和父母同伴依恋量表对755名高校大学生进行问卷调查.基于主客体互倚模型分析,结果发现:①母亲拒绝的教养方式与亲子依恋之间为主客体效应,与非留守组相比,留守组主体效应更弱,客体效应差异不显著;父亲拒绝的教养方式与亲子依恋之间为主体效应,留守组与非留守组客体效应不显著但是组间差异显著.②父母情感温暖的教养方式与亲子依恋之间为主客体效应;组间差异不显著.③母亲过度保护的教养方式与亲子依恋之间为主客体效应,组间差异不显著;父亲过度保护的教养方式与亲子依恋主客体效应均不显著,留守组中客体效应显著.

       

      Abstract: To investigate the relationship between parenting styles and parent-child attachment among college students, as well as the role of left-behind experiences, this study employed the Simplified Chinese Version of the Parenting Style Questionnaire (S-EMBU-C) and the Parent-Child Attachment Scale (IPPA-R) to survey 755 university students. Based on the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model analysis, the results revealed that: ① The relationship between mothers’ rejecting parenting styles and parent-child attachment exhibited actor-partner effects. Compared with non-left-behind groups, left-behind groups showed weaker actor effect but no significant differences in partner effect. Fathers’ rejecting parenting styles primarily influenced parent-child attachment through actor effects, with no significant object effects between groups but significant intergroup differences. ② Affectionate parenting styles showed actor-partner effects in relation to parent-child attachment, though no significant intergroup differences were observed. ③ Overprotective parenting styles demonstrated actor-partner effects in parent-child attachment relationships, with no significant intergroup differences. Fathers’overprotective parenting styles showed no significant actor-partner effects, while left-behind groups exhibited significant partner effects.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回