马燕, 李永志. 数据产品的知识产权保护研究J. 内江师范学院学报, 2026, 41(5): 77-84. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.05.013
    引用本文: 马燕, 李永志. 数据产品的知识产权保护研究J. 内江师范学院学报, 2026, 41(5): 77-84. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.05.013
    MA Yan, LI Yongzhi. On the Intellectual Property Protection of Data ProductsJ. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2026, 41(5): 77-84. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.05.013
    Citation: MA Yan, LI Yongzhi. On the Intellectual Property Protection of Data ProductsJ. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2026, 41(5): 77-84. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.05.013

    数据产品的知识产权保护研究

    On the Intellectual Property Protection of Data Products

    • 摘要: 数据产品是数据要素价值转化的高阶形态,也是数据要素价值释放的重要载体,但却因现行制度供给不足而面临权属模糊、流通壁垒等发展难题。数据产品客体形态的非物质性、产生过程的智力劳动性以及价值释放的流通共享性,使其符合以劳动财产权理论和功利主义理论为正当性来源的知识产权保护逻辑。数据产品知识产权通过利益平衡、创新激励以及资源优化配置,可以有效破解传统保护路径的碎片化缺陷,具有流通开放性与规则系统性等制度优势。通过构建以数据产品生产者和数据来源者为核心的二元主体架构,明确以控制权和处分权为核心的权利内容体系,确立以登记生效为核心的形式审查确权方式,并配备赋权期限与合理使用的权利限制规则,既可以为数据产品提供适配性的制度保护框架,还可以为数据要素价值释放提供规范性支撑,最终实现数据产品专有保护与价值流通的动态平衡。

       

      Abstract: Data products (DPs), as the advanced form of the value transformation of data factors, serve as crucial carriers for unlocking such value. However, they are confronted with development challenges like ambiguous ownership and circulation barriers, owing to insufficient institutional framework. DPs have three key features: the immaterial nature, the intellectual labor involved in their production, and unlocking their value through circulation and sharing. These features align with the logic of intellectual property protection, which is justified by the labor theory of property and utilitarian theory. Intellectual property for DPs can effectively resolve the fragmentation of traditional protection paths. This is achieved through interest balancing, innovation incentives, and optimized resource allocation, while also offering institutional advantages such as circulation openness and systematic rules. Therefore, a tailored protection framework should be constructed that requires a dual-subject architecture centered on producers and data sources. It must clarify rights of control and disposition, and establish a registration-based formal review system. Additionally, rules on term limitations and fair use are essential for such a framework to provide normative support for unlocking data value. Ultimately, it achieves a dynamic balance between exclusive protection and value circulation.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回