廖荣谦. 乡规民约:明清时期贵州民族地区基层乡村的社会教化J. 内江师范学院学报, 2026, 41(3): 113-118. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.03.018
    引用本文: 廖荣谦. 乡规民约:明清时期贵州民族地区基层乡村的社会教化J. 内江师范学院学报, 2026, 41(3): 113-118. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.03.018
    LIAO Rongqian. Rules and Regulations of Villages: Moral Guidance in Guizhou’s Villages of Ethnic Minority during the Ming and Qing DynastiesJ. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2026, 41(3): 113-118. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.03.018
    Citation: LIAO Rongqian. Rules and Regulations of Villages: Moral Guidance in Guizhou’s Villages of Ethnic Minority during the Ming and Qing DynastiesJ. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2026, 41(3): 113-118. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.03.018

    乡规民约:明清时期贵州民族地区基层乡村的社会教化

    Rules and Regulations of Villages: Moral Guidance in Guizhou’s Villages of Ethnic Minority during the Ming and Qing Dynasties

    • 摘要: 乡规民约在社会治理中不仅发挥着维护公序良俗的法律功能,还承担着思想政治教化的教育功能,是传统乡村社会法治与教化融合的重要产物。明清时期,在贵州民族地区的基层乡村,以乡规民约为核心的社会教育体系中,其施教主体涵盖各级政府官员、村寨管理者、土司首领及少数民族首领。他们通过自上而下的多种方式推行教化,包括宣讲圣谕律令、设立奖惩机制、传播文化教育风气以及制定具体行为规则。借助这些途径,国家治理理念得以从政策层面有效贯彻至具体事务的管理之中,实现了政令与民情的衔接。

       

      Abstract: Rules and regulations of villages not only served a legal function in maintaining public order and social decency but also played an educational role in cultivation of moral and core values. They were thus a key product of the integration of rule of law and moral guidance in traditional rural society. During the Ming and Qing dynasties, a social education system centered on such covenants took shape in the villages of ethnic minority areas in Guizhou. Its implementing agents included government officials at various levels, village administrators, tusi (native chieftains), and ethnic minority leaders. These agents carried out moral guidance through four principal top-down methods. These methods encompassed: 1) expounding imperial edicts and statutes; 2) establishing reward and punishment mechanisms; 3) disseminating literacy and educational practices; and 4) formulating specific codes of conduct. The methods served as a vital medium for translating the state’s governing philosophy from policy into concrete local governance. They also helped to bridge the gap between state directives and local customs.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回