李鑫. 民法视域下请托司法适用困境与规范路径——以192份判例为基础J. 内江师范学院学报, 2026, 41(1): 116-123. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.01.019
    引用本文: 李鑫. 民法视域下请托司法适用困境与规范路径——以192份判例为基础J. 内江师范学院学报, 2026, 41(1): 116-123. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.01.019
    LI Xin. Problems in Commission’s Judicial Application and Their Standardized Paths under a Perspective of Civil Law with 192 Verdicts as ExamplesJ. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2026, 41(1): 116-123. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.01.019
    Citation: LI Xin. Problems in Commission’s Judicial Application and Their Standardized Paths under a Perspective of Civil Law with 192 Verdicts as ExamplesJ. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2026, 41(1): 116-123. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2026.01.019

    民法视域下请托司法适用困境与规范路径——以192份判例为基础

    Problems in Commission’s Judicial Application and Their Standardized Paths under a Perspective of Civil Law with 192 Verdicts as Examples

    • 摘要: 请托问题由来已久。由于我国现行法律对请托行为的规制缺位,学术界和实务界对请托行为的性质、效力以及钱款返还问题等方面尚未达成共识。从民法视角看,请托行为宜定性为委托合同,并纳入民事法律规范的调整范畴。对于请托行为的效力,法院应遵循民事法律行为效力判断规则,并结合《合同编解释》第十六条和第十七条进行综合判定;对于请托钱款的返还问题,法院应区分请托有效与无效的情形并进行分别考量。尤其是在请托行为无效时,法院应结合证明标准及双方过错程度,区分情形处理资金返还问题。

       

      Abstract: Commission has existed for a long time. Due to the lack of regulation of commission by law in our country, both academic circle and practice field have not reached agreement on the nature, effect and money return of commission. From a perspective of civil law, the commission should be taken as a contract and brought into regulation by civil law. As for its effect, the court should follow the judgement rule of civil juristic acts and make a judgement according to the 16th and 17th articles of Interpretation of Contract Section of Civil Code. In terms of money return, the court should distinguish the valid commission from the void one. Especially when the commission is invalid, the court should deal with the money return according to the evidence and degree of both parties’ fault.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回