包开鑫. 知识的来源、特征与价值——杜威知识观的解读[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2025, 40(5): 83-87. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2025.05.014
    引用本文: 包开鑫. 知识的来源、特征与价值——杜威知识观的解读[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2025, 40(5): 83-87. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2025.05.014
    BAO Kaixin. Sources, Features and Value of Knowledge: An Interpretation of DEWEY’s Conception of Knowledge[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2025, 40(5): 83-87. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2025.05.014
    Citation: BAO Kaixin. Sources, Features and Value of Knowledge: An Interpretation of DEWEY’s Conception of Knowledge[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2025, 40(5): 83-87. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2025.05.014

    知识的来源、特征与价值——杜威知识观的解读

    Sources, Features and Value of Knowledge: An Interpretation of DEWEY’s Conception of Knowledge

    • 摘要: 知识观是教育学经典话题。自古希腊以来,始终存在经验主义与理性主义二元分裂的知识观。杜威反思知识二元论,重构经验内涵,把经验视为有机体与环境互动的结果。杜威提出知识具有先验理论与情境感知统一、实践检验与行动反思结合、暂时确定与持续更新融通的特征。知识是过程与结果、主体与客体的统一体。杜威的知识观具有解决现实问题、搭建民主桥梁、增扩知识容量的价值。理论探讨最终服务于现实需求,明晰杜威知识观,能够为教学与课程改革提供可参考的方案。

       

      Abstract: The conception of knowledge has long been a classic topic in pedagogy. Since ancient Greece, there has been a dualistic split between empiricism and rationalism in epistemology. John DEWEY (1859-1952) critically examined this dualism of knowledge and reconstructed the nature of experience. DEWEY defined experience as the outcome of interaction between organisms and their environment. He proposed that knowledge is characterized by unity, integration and synthesis. The unity represents the harmonious convergence of a priori theoretical knowledge and situational perception. The integration aspect pertains to the seamless combination of practical verification and reflective action. The synthesis encompasses the delicate balance between attaining a sense of provisional certainty and the necessity of continual revision. It can follow that knowledge represents both process and product, subject and object in unity. The value of DEWEY’s conception of knowledge embodies in addressing real-world problems, building democratic bridges, and expanding the capacity for knowledge. Theoretical exploration ultimately serves practical needs. Therefore, a clear understanding on the conception can provide reference frameworks for pedagogical and curricular reforms.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回