高级搜索
    陈 涛. 历史的真实与历史理解的真实 ——关于深化范长江研究的几点思考[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2014, (9): 29-32. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2014.09.006
    引用本文: 陈 涛. 历史的真实与历史理解的真实 ——关于深化范长江研究的几点思考[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2014, (9): 29-32. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2014.09.006
    shu
    CHEN Tao. The Historical Facts and the Truth in Historical Understanding: Reflectionson Deepened Study of FAN Chang-jiang[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2014, (9): 29-32. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2014.09.006
    Citation: CHEN Tao. The Historical Facts and the Truth in Historical Understanding: Reflectionson Deepened Study of FAN Chang-jiang[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2014, (9): 29-32. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2014.09.006
    shu

    历史的真实与历史理解的真实 ——关于深化范长江研究的几点思考

    The Historical Facts and the Truth in Historical Understanding: Reflectionson Deepened Study of FAN Chang-jiang

      摘要
    • 摘要: 近三十年来范长江的研究发展至今已呈现出遭遇瓶颈的态势。突破瓶颈, 深化研究须突破三个问题:范长江是“人”还是政治符号问题; 范长江的世界观及其内在矛盾问题; 特殊语境的理解与历史理解问题。

       

      Abstract: In the past thirty years, the study of FAN Chang-jiang has appeared to meet its bottleneck. The three questions which are to break this bottleneck are whether FAN is an individual person or a political symbol, FAN's world view and its internal contradictions, and the understanding of certain context and history.

       

      • HTML全文
      • 参考文献(6)
      • 相关文章
      • 施引文献
    • 资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回