李永成. 结构现实主义的两种均势逻辑[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2011, (1): 6-10.
    引用本文: 李永成. 结构现实主义的两种均势逻辑[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2011, (1): 6-10.
    LI Yongcheng. On the Two Kinds of Balanced Logics in Structural Realism[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2011, (1): 6-10.
    Citation: LI Yongcheng. On the Two Kinds of Balanced Logics in Structural Realism[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2011, (1): 6-10.

    结构现实主义的两种均势逻辑

    On the Two Kinds of Balanced Logics in Structural Realism

    • 摘要: 在结构现实主义国际关系理论中,权力护持以及与之密不可分的均势政治规律是最核心的问题之一。华尔兹和米尔斯海默对国家权力护持战略的不同论析导向了两种均势政治逻辑。虽然华尔兹和米尔斯海默均势理论的分析逻辑有些差别,但二者对均势规律本身的关注告诉我们,均势政治在21世纪并没有过时。作为一个具有成长为“全面超级大国”的迅速发展的大国,中国必须洞悉国际政治中的均势规律,并对自己的对外关系尤其是对美关系有全面、科学的统筹设计和战略规划,避免成为均势规律的牺牲品。

       

      Abstract: In the theory of international relations oriented by structural realism, the protection of power and the balanced politics that is closely related to it is one of the most fundamental questions. The Waltz’s and Mearsheimer’s different analyses and views of the national protection of power lead to two kinds of balanced politic logics. Though there exist some differences between the two persons’ analyses, their attention to the balanced rules tell us that the balanced politics is not outdated in the 21st century. As a big nation which will rapidly grow into a “comprehensive superpower”, China has to know clearly the balanced rules in the international politics and lay out the comprehensive and scientific strategic Sino-American relations in order not to be the sacrifice of such rule.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回