高级搜索
    聂鑫, 施霞. 中文版知觉应激反应量表的修订[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2023, 38(4): 12-17. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2023.04.003
    引用本文: 聂鑫, 施霞. 中文版知觉应激反应量表的修订[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2023, 38(4): 12-17. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2023.04.003
    shu
    NIE Xin, SHI Xia. On the revision of the Chinese version of the perceived stress reactivity scale[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2023, 38(4): 12-17. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2023.04.003
    Citation: NIE Xin, SHI Xia. On the revision of the Chinese version of the perceived stress reactivity scale[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2023, 38(4): 12-17. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2023.04.003
    shu

    中文版知觉应激反应量表的修订

    On the revision of the Chinese version of the perceived stress reactivity scale

      摘要
    • 摘要: 为了考察知觉应激反应量表中文版在我国大学生中的信度和效度.采用方便取样方法,共选取836名大学生进行测试.结果表明:探索性因素分析共获得5个因子,累计方差解释率为53.00%;验证性因素分析显示,模型的各项指数均拟合良好.PSRS中文版五个分量表的内部一致性信度在0.73~0.76;重测信度在0.60~0.76.综上,PSRS中文版结构稳定、信效度等指标均达到心理学测量要求,可以作为测量我国大学生群体对知觉应激反应的有效工具.

       

      Abstract: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the perceived stress reactivity scale (PSRS) in Chinese college students, a total of 836 college students were selected for the test using convenient sampling. The exploratory factor analysis finds five common factors with a total cumulative explained variance rate of 53.00%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that each index of the model fits well. The internal consistency reliabilities of the five subscales lie between 0.73 ~ 0.76; and the retested reliability ranges from 0.60 to 0.76. The structural stability, reliability and validity of Chinese version of the PSRS have all met the requirements of psychological measurement, and thus can be used as an effective tool to measure the response of Chinese college students to perceived stress.

       

      • HTML全文
      • 参考文献(30)
      • 相关文章
      • 施引文献
    • 资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回