周钧韬. 朱星《金瓶梅》研究的成就与失误[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2016, (11): 6-13. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2016.11.002
    引用本文: 周钧韬. 朱星《金瓶梅》研究的成就与失误[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2016, (11): 6-13. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2016.11.002
    ZHOU Jun-tao. On ZHU Xing's Achievements and Mistakes in Study of Chin Ping Mei[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2016, (11): 6-13. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2016.11.002
    Citation: ZHOU Jun-tao. On ZHU Xing's Achievements and Mistakes in Study of Chin Ping Mei[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2016, (11): 6-13. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2016.11.002

    朱星《金瓶梅》研究的成就与失误

    On ZHU Xing's Achievements and Mistakes in Study of Chin Ping Mei

    • 摘要: 朱星是中国当年金瓶梅研究的开创者。通过严密考证认定《金瓶梅》作者是王世贞,否定了鲁迅、郑振铎、吴晗对王世贞说的否定,在《金瓶梅》作者研究研究史上建立了一大功勋。他在不知道毛泽东提出的《金瓶梅》“写了明朝的真正的历史”的论断的情况下,通过考证,提出《金瓶梅》是“一部明末社会史”的论断,难能可贵。他的《金瓶梅》版本考证及早期《金瓶梅》无淫秽语的洁本说,欠妥。

       

      Abstract: ZHU Xing was a pioneer of studying Chin Ping Mei. Through rigorous textual research, he confirmed WANG Shi-zhen as the writer of the novel Chin Ping Mei and negated the view held by LU Xun, ZHENG Zhen-duo and WU Han that the novel had not been written by WANG. Therefore, he made great achievement in studying the writer of this novel. In ignorance of MAO Ze-dong's argument that the novel has written a real history of Ming Dynasty, he proposed, through textual research, that the novel was a social history of late Ming Dynasty. This really deserved people's praise. However, his textual research of the editions of the novel and the early view that there was no obscene language in the novel was not so correct.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回