张 循. 尊师与尊道:战国时代的学风与师生关系[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2016, (1): 61-63. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2016.01.011
    引用本文: 张 循. 尊师与尊道:战国时代的学风与师生关系[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 2016, (1): 61-63. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2016.01.011
    ZHANG Xun. Respecting Teachers andMorality-On Learning Styles and Relationships between Teachers and Their Pupils in Warring States Period[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2016, (1): 61-63. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2016.01.011
    Citation: ZHANG Xun. Respecting Teachers andMorality-On Learning Styles and Relationships between Teachers and Their Pupils in Warring States Period[J]. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 2016, (1): 61-63. DOI: 10.13603/j.cnki.51-1621/z.2016.01.011

    尊师与尊道:战国时代的学风与师生关系

    Respecting Teachers andMorality-On Learning Styles and Relationships between Teachers and Their Pupils in Warring States Period

    • 摘要: 战国学术传承中,存在“尊师”与“尊道”两种风格。前者要求恪守师说,不能稍有违背; 后者则强调“道”在“师”之上,“尊道”之时不必称师。两种不同的学术风格同时存在,但在历史实际中,这两种风格又并非壁垒分明,而很可能是交织在一起的。这一情况充分展现了战国学术思想的复杂与曲折,同时也是我国教育史初始阶段值得关注的问题。

       

      Abstract: In the academic inheritance of Warring States period, there were two styles: respecting teachers and respecting morality. The former required the strict following of teachers' theories and there should be no deviation. While the latter stressed the priority of morality over teachers. When people followed morality, they need not to take teachers into consideration. The two academic propositions with different styles existed simultaneously. However, in history, such two propositions were not completely different, but most probably interwoven. This fully showed the complexity of academic thoughts in Warring States period. Moreover, it is worth of our attention in the study of early stage of education history.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回